> upgrate to tor whereas you can expect the traffic analyisis capabilities of > And actually it's probably getting worse because there isn't any > Many sites disappear EVERY year or two. > 'authorities' would like to remove but can't.

> prove me wrong and POST EVIDENCE, that is, links to content that the > 'in the past you could find links on reddit to. Sea Kitten Palace Įven so, the collections on Freenet are far more extensive. A quick scan yielded eight that were up when I checked:Ĭhild a Priori - because children always come first Ummm, no :) There are still many extreme. > Furthermore, you can find that sort of 'CP' on clearnet.

> think there's 'lots of CP' on i2p or tor. > wearing a bikini is 'child porn'? And even going by such 'definition' I don't > that of the puritan, jew-kristian, american government? Any girl under 18 > By now I'm starting to suspect that your definition of 'child porn' is > One of the major Russian marketplaces is (or was) on I2P. I'm tired of it ) I was serious about Riffle, though :) Think that we agree that lack of demand has stalled implementation, evenĪnd so, I'm going to drop the rest of the discussion about this, because In particular, higher-latency mix networks with padding. We at least agree that better anonymity networks are > of course true, and something I never denied.So not sure how that comment > But you are saying that a critical mass of users is required, which is > mix networks were not really needed, so no demand and no supply. > that tor was 'good enough' for AP, I assumed that you further added that slow

> implemented because they could not possibly be useful. I misread and thought you said they were not being > academic paper, and perhaps some tens of people testing it? How can you use a mix network that exists only as an So? Well, if they are not being implemented, they're not

Central park onion tor